Difference between revisions of "Contact Reports"

From Hinaharap ng sangkatauhan
Line 69: Line 69:
  
 
==Translations==
 
==Translations==
'''Translation FAQ'''  <span class="mw-customtoggle-translationfaq"><small><small>[Show/Hide]</small></small></span>
+
'''Website FAQ'''  <span class="mw-customtoggle-websitefaq"><small><small>[Show/Hide]</small></small></span>
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-translationfaq">
+
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-websitefaq">
 
<small>
 
<small>
 
'''Q: What language is the website in?'''<br>
 
'''Q: What language is the website in?'''<br>
  
 
A: It's an English language website which hosts English content with a German language copy placed on the right hand side, where an original source for the translation is available for the presentation. The original Billy Meier documents are in German which technically means it's an English and German website. The website links to other languages and where contextually appropriate. The [[Downloads]], [[Rare Archives]] sections and a few individual pages, may be or include items presented in other languages, of varying consistencies.
 
A: It's an English language website which hosts English content with a German language copy placed on the right hand side, where an original source for the translation is available for the presentation. The original Billy Meier documents are in German which technically means it's an English and German website. The website links to other languages and where contextually appropriate. The [[Downloads]], [[Rare Archives]] sections and a few individual pages, may be or include items presented in other languages, of varying consistencies.
 
'''Q: Why have the new translations not been added and updated yet?'''<br>
 
 
A: See [[Contributing_Content|Contributing content]] and read the section below, appeal to all responsible, about the voluntary nature of translating and updating the wiki’s content.
 
 
'''Q: You change the translations?'''<br>
 
 
A: The base story in German and in English has never changed. Faultfinding is different, we're correcting errors, improving the translations and using http://dict.figu.org as well as regular over the counter dictionaries.
 
  
 
'''Q: Can you install a better search extension?'''<br>
 
'''Q: Can you install a better search extension?'''<br>
Line 103: Line 95:
 
www.futureofmankind.info is a mirror of the website on a faster server, great for searching. It's overwritten every night so editors sign in to the .co.uk
 
www.futureofmankind.info is a mirror of the website on a faster server, great for searching. It's overwritten every night so editors sign in to the .co.uk
  
'''Q: Why does FutureofMankind place the original German text on the right and English on the left, when some of the [[External_Links|other]] websites do it the other way?'''
+
'''Q: Why does FutureofMankind place the original German text on the right and English on the left, when some of the [[External_Links|other]] websites do it the other way?'''<br>
  
 
A: FutureofMankind is an English language website, in English we read from left to right. It's promotional of the original German text when each English sentence is followed by the German and not the edge of the screen. It's not ignored as readily, especially where we've been able to align sentences. It may also maintain the standard of established literary wiki agreements. However the arrangement may be associated with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_left-hand_traffic driving on the left] where the shaking of hands using the right hand is generally considered proper etiquette. It’s unclear exactly why placing the original German on the right feels correct, but it feels right to read it that way to us.
 
A: FutureofMankind is an English language website, in English we read from left to right. It's promotional of the original German text when each English sentence is followed by the German and not the edge of the screen. It's not ignored as readily, especially where we've been able to align sentences. It may also maintain the standard of established literary wiki agreements. However the arrangement may be associated with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_left-hand_traffic driving on the left] where the shaking of hands using the right hand is generally considered proper etiquette. It’s unclear exactly why placing the original German on the right feels correct, but it feels right to read it that way to us.
  
'''Q: Can I have more information about this, where can I find more information about that?'''
+
'''Q: Can I have more information about this, where can I find more information about that?'''<br>
  
 
A: The main thing it has taught us is that there is allot we don't know. Use the search, have a look at the [[External Links]]. There may be times when you'll want to think about it and times when you want community and to talk about it, have a look at the [[External Links]] and the facebook groups. There are plenty of resources available but you're on your own.
 
A: The main thing it has taught us is that there is allot we don't know. Use the search, have a look at the [[External Links]]. There may be times when you'll want to think about it and times when you want community and to talk about it, have a look at the [[External Links]] and the facebook groups. There are plenty of resources available but you're on your own.
Line 115: Line 107:
 
A: At first its recommended that you not concern much about your unknowing and to approach it vicariously for a while. It’s a community of independent individuals and you will have to make your own mind up and form your own opinions about everything eventually. Its international so all the different standards and methodologies of presentation and how they've been combined and formed over the time may gradually emerge. It may require searching for sources and references on your own if you want more information about a specific subject that interests you, just as all those that came before you had to do to develop an understanding of all the whys and wherefores of everything. In the process you may slowly learn how to use the site. There are plenty of resources available but you're on your own.
 
A: At first its recommended that you not concern much about your unknowing and to approach it vicariously for a while. It’s a community of independent individuals and you will have to make your own mind up and form your own opinions about everything eventually. Its international so all the different standards and methodologies of presentation and how they've been combined and formed over the time may gradually emerge. It may require searching for sources and references on your own if you want more information about a specific subject that interests you, just as all those that came before you had to do to develop an understanding of all the whys and wherefores of everything. In the process you may slowly learn how to use the site. There are plenty of resources available but you're on your own.
  
'''Q: Regarding the creation–evolution controversy also termed the creation vs. evolution debate or the origins debate. What does Billy Meier say?'''
+
'''Q: Can I make a donation to the website?'''<br>
  
A: Billy has written lots about it in various documents, apparently the way it is: it's evolution, creation and creation-evolution and reincarnation and its religion and its relegeon too. He's confused many of us to the point of silence, some cannot tolerate using the word creation and some incapable of using the word evolution, some come from a religious background, others from no affiliation groups such as scientists and free-thinkers. Billy has given the various methods of delivery for each audience, otherwise keeping quiet to allow us to check and work it out for ourselves. Talking and writing plentifully about nature and the most simplistic observations of the natural way. Creation and evolution may mean something different things to a reader, see [[FIGU - related_terms]]. The bible and many religions has had it's distortions extensively reviewed by the Plejaren. The atheist has been described as "going a different way", though FIGU say there is no [[God]]. There has been extensive explanations about spirit, supernatural and various unseen, undiscovered forces. Both the evolutionist and creationist are right in many ways, but wrong in others, however both have such an ephemeral, shallow understanding of it all that neither affiliated person tends to go far enough to make sense. Leaving the very best religious scholars and very best scientists around the world, who have really studied these matters, with a special marriage of knowledge at that refined end of explanation. As the consciousness development and consciousness-evolution progresses, information is released from the variably named [[Storage Banks]], which is a fine-material repository of accumulated cognitions from previous lives. This is why civilization carries on and progresses, it doesn't restart every generation, it's a flow of progression. Creativity and invention falls upon certain individuals which we call talent but which in truth have dealt with the specialism at length before in their individual cases. Albert Einstein might very well have been a notable scientist in a previous civilization, however that does not mean he has not been a farmer, cleaner and other professions in between it just means that given the right educational triggers he exceptionally excelled in the subject. This is why a great quantity of education for every citizen is important for society, as well as many good and open opportunities to do things. Hidden inside the explanation is that Earth has a minority of previously, former extraterrestrials in spirit, see [[Reincarnation]], who given the educational triggering circumstances could progress humanity much further and rapidly, because a creative-natural law according to the Plejaren is that spirit-forms have to incarnate on the planet in which they died, leaving Earth with around 5 million from previous civilizations. However given the wrong educational triggers and an otherwise genius such as Adolf Hitler, who was very intelligent up to university, and then profound individuals can also do profoundly negative degenerative things too of global importance as well as in addition to those generative things, the binary opposition science applies to human beings too. This is why civilization must be managed well with plenty of factual education and economic stability in society is very important etc. This incidentally is how we know [[Malona]] wasn't managed well.<sup>[citations needed]</sup>  
+
A: You are most welcome to make a donation to the website. It continues to be hosted here because of these donations, see the [[Donate]] page if you would like to and thank you. The website has a fairly sizeable web hosting and domain, expenses fee as far as such fees go, annually, due to the shear size of the resource here. The donations are used to pay for it, and will be used to ensure the website continues to be available for as long as it possibly can be.</small>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
</div>
 +
'''Translation FAQ''' <span class="mw-customtoggle-translationfaq"><small><small>[Show/Hide]</small></small></span>
 +
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-translationfaq">
 +
<small>
 +
'''Q: Why have the new translations not been added and updated yet?'''<br>
  
'''Q: I just want to know if Billy Meier is professing to be offering devine revelation?'''
+
A: See [[Contributing_Content|Contributing content]] and read the section below, appeal to all responsible, about the voluntary nature of translating and updating the wiki’s content.
  
A: The Plejaren are using a sizeable quantity of technologies, most of them we have only theories about, some we have not even imagined yet, even in all the science fiction narratives we’ve created, and do remember that our history is very rapidly accelerated. They have proven this, that they have these by a variety of methods, most of the proofs have never been explored by investigators because they argue why bother investigating it any further if there are false images. Some of the proofs have been given great thought, but rarely if ever advertised at the front of the Billy Meier case in the presentations, radio interviews, about it etc. These technologies can for example retrieve information, lots of it, which many with no scientific education would see as strange, even scientists themselves would find it strange and have done, because these are sciences which as said we have only theories about etc. but over and over again they talk about natural laws and creative-natural laws, these technologies can only do what is possible within the universes natural laws i.e. science, and while sometimes appearing illogical are entirely logical its just that we have not got around to discovering these areas of science as repeated. In 2017 for example a few events were published in the Zeitzeichen publication detailing events which were to occur just a few days later, and did, but only the interested readers would have caught that at the time. There is plenty of documented not yet happened predictions too, but they dont want this to be accessible to everyone, they want FIGU audience to remain a reasonable size and not grow too large.<sup>[citations needed]</sup>
+
'''Q: You change the translations?'''<br>
  
'''Q: How can I get a job in politics with my values without lying my way in?'''
+
A: The base story in German and in English has never changed. Faultfinding is different, we're correcting errors, improving the translations and using http://dict.figu.org as well as regular over the counter dictionaries.
  
A: That isn’t necessarily what is meant by the show will go on if it continues that no one in politics takes responsibility. In another area of the information we’re told how we’ll have to work up a tremendously powerful non-aggressive mightful force and then ram the worlds governments like they’ve never been rammed before if we want anything generative and progressive in the future, probably because they’re all strongly religious. There are no firm answers that are given to this question actually, you’re on your own (is what the Plejaren are saying).
+
'''Q: Why is the abbreviation “resp.” used in translations, when it has no meaning to native speakers and doesn't derive from English. And what does it mean?'''<br>
 
 
'''Q: You can change your name. You can change your gender. Why not your age??'''
 
 
 
A: It is not necessary to do everything in a courtroom, you can use nicknames, abbreviation names etc., Billy’s name is actually Eduard. It is not possible to technically change gender in entirety yet, the outward appearance, reputation and legal status etc. can be changed. Regarding your age, you can make up any number you want, but similarly its a deception, your age group of people are your people, you’ve grown old together. If you want to do some adventure sports and social media with the younger people at age 70 etc., then if you feel young inside and your accepted by them for what you are then why bother to lie about yourself, but if you lie about your age what may happen is that you may be more likely to find someone who lies about theirs disingenuously. Genetically engineered technologies are not available yet. As a brain develops with an identity, if that identity changes, the brain may not necessarily change with it.
 
 
 
'''Q: Why is the abbreviation “resp.” used in translations, when it has no meaning to native speakers and doesn't derive from English. And what does it mean?'''
 
  
 
A: It throws new readers off, but after a dozen encounters the probable meaning becomes reasonably clear. It does tend to furrow a few brows though. The writer is explaining something and reinforcing that explanation. It could mean; that is; i.e.; or; rather; also; and; also known as; more precisely; more precisely known as; with respect to; in respect of, etc. It may also mean; regarding; with regards to, and see also.
 
A: It throws new readers off, but after a dozen encounters the probable meaning becomes reasonably clear. It does tend to furrow a few brows though. The writer is explaining something and reinforcing that explanation. It could mean; that is; i.e.; or; rather; also; and; also known as; more precisely; more precisely known as; with respect to; in respect of, etc. It may also mean; regarding; with regards to, and see also.
Line 138: Line 131:
  
 
i.e. isn't English either it came from Latin but isn't Latin.<br>
 
i.e. isn't English either it came from Latin but isn't Latin.<br>
resp. isn’t German either it came from English but isn’t English.
+
resp. isn’t English or German either it came from English or German but isn’t German or English.
  
 
'''Q: Why is the dash character '-' used between two words often and what does it mean?'''
 
'''Q: Why is the dash character '-' used between two words often and what does it mean?'''
Line 146: Line 139:
 
'''Q: Why is Völkerflucht and Volk being translated to folk and folks instead of people and peoples?'''
 
'''Q: Why is Völkerflucht and Volk being translated to folk and folks instead of people and peoples?'''
  
A: Verification required but because when the ladies and gentlemen in the original Norfolk and Suffolk, East Anglia England began the Anglosphere words they either evolved the German language words or retained the Danish, Dutch and Swedish words which they already knew because many were from Germany and those other nations, from volk to folk, it was only later when for whatever reason people came in during the various invasions and colonisations then the standardisation of English occured because English is a mix of several languages. We're translating from German into English so it makes sense to use the words that pair better. The etymology of people is latin anglo norman french, and folk is old english dutch german. Besides that the Plejaren have described the word 'people' as meaning something less generative than 'folk'.<sup>[citation needed]</sup> If your next question is why we use the latin etymology spiritus to spirit instead of the german etymology geist to ghost, that is apparently a different and special circumstance because we've regrettably loaded the word ghost with all sorts of angst and fear, but not the word spirit, so the german route is not recommended on that occasion. Lowestoft in England e.g. comes from the old name Lois (like Lois Lane superman) or lewis with the old norse word toft meaning town, meaning the closest name were it translated into the modern world would be Louisville in Kentucky. Kent Clark? Supermenschen. Theres a place in Kent, England, called Folkestone, possibly as Volkstein. Overbevolking and Überbevölkerung doesn't work with folks, uses Latin instead as overpopulation. Volkswagen under the regime would be Folkwagon, possibly a Folksaloon. People, folk, mankind, humans etc.
+
A: Verification required but because when the ladies and gentlemen in the original Norfolk and Suffolk, East Anglia England began the Anglosphere words they either evolved the German language words or retained the Danish, Dutch and Swedish words which they already knew because many were from Germany and those other nations, from volk to folk, it was only later when for whatever reason people came in during the various invasions and colonisations then the standardisation of English occured because English is a mix of several languages. We're translating from German into English so it makes sense to use the words that pair better. The etymology of people is latin anglo norman french, and folk is old english dutch german. Besides that the Plejaren have described the word 'people' as meaning something less generative than 'folk'.<sup>[citation needed]</sup> If your next question is why we use the latin etymology spiritus to spirit instead of the german etymology geist to ghost, that is apparently a different and special circumstance because we've regrettably loaded the word ghost with all sorts of angst and fear, but not the word spirit, so the german route is not recommended on that occasion. There's a place in Kent, England, called Folkestone, possibly in German it may be Volkstein. Overbevolking and Überbevölkerung doesn't work with folks, or it would be overfolking, it uses the Latin instead, as overpopulation. Volkswagen under the regime would be Folkwagon, possibly a Folksaloon. People, folk, mankind, humans etc.
  
 
'''Q: Why are selected words capitalised?'''
 
'''Q: Why are selected words capitalised?'''
Line 166: Line 159:
 
'''Q: Can I list Billy Meiers UFOs or story in my youtube top ten video?'''
 
'''Q: Can I list Billy Meiers UFOs or story in my youtube top ten video?'''
  
A: It’s the best collection of UFOs in the entire world, so it would make sense that you did. We’re not in a position to say yes because we don’t own the copyright. However Billy’s images have been used by television networks without them ever paying a royalty to him for decades, not that it makes it ok. Providing your portraying the information fairly i.e. honestly, being reasonable with the presentation, not distorting or defaming, there probably isn’t going to be an objection to it if it’s not objectionable. You could write FIGU copyright, FIGU.org or FutureofMankind.info somewhere such as in the corner or in the description, which is helpful to those wanting to find it and read more about it. It’s not a video we would recommend makers to make, but it’s the best UFO information available in the world, longest running and highest standards, so maybe you want to. We advise against a negative review of it because our historical research into poor reviews have shown they’ve attracted unnecessary unpleasantness for the makers, writers, authors, and it’s a waste of time and for what audience. A neutral presentation such as listing it and even a critical-analysis is acceptable. It’s not fake so take care to check before.
+
A: It’s the best collection of UFOs in the entire world, so it would make sense that you did. We’re not in a position to say yes because we don’t own the copyright. However Billy’s images have been used by television networks without them ever paying a royalty to him for decades, not that it makes it ok. Providing your portraying the information fairly i.e. honestly, being reasonable with the presentation, not distorting or defaming, there probably isn’t going to be an objection to it if it’s not objectionable. You could write FIGU copyright, FIGU.org or FutureofMankind.info somewhere such as in the corner or in the description, which is helpful to those wanting to find it and read more about it. It’s not a video we would recommend makers to make, but it’s the best UFO information available in the world, longest running and highest standards, so maybe you want to. We advise against a negative review of it because our historical research into poor reviews have shown they’ve attracted unnecessary unpleasantness for the makers, writers, authors, and it’s a waste of time and for what audience. A neutral presentation such as listing it and even a critical-analysis is acceptable. It’s not fake so take care to check before.</small>
 
+
<br>
'''Q: Can I make a donation to the website?'''<br>
 
 
 
A: You are most welcome to make a donation to the website. It continues to be hosted here because of these donations, see the [[Donate]] page if you would like to and thank you. The website has a fairly sizeable web hosting and domain, expenses fee as far as such fees go, annually, due to the shear size of the resource here. The donations are used to pay for it, and will be used to ensure the website continues to be available for as long as it possibly can be.</small>
 
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 08:35, 8 November 2018

"We are only here in order to fulfil our mission and the prevention of the catastrophe and to prepare you for your difficult assignment as prophet. For further things, like help with evolution and so forth, other forms of life from your own universe are responsible, who will initially called themselves Pleiadians. Already for millennia, they supervise the Earth and keep those space-faring races in check who wish evil for you Earth humans and want to gain control over Earth humanity with the employment of religion and all the related deceptions, hallucinations, and trickery with which they buoy up the Earth humans with false promises."
Asket, February 1953


Introduction

Eduard Meier first communicated with extraterrestrials from 1942 to 1953 with Sfath, an older gentlemen from Erra (Pleiades / Plejaren).

Subsequent contacts then emerged from 1953 to 1964 with Asket, a woman who originates from the DAL Universe.

Eduard since 1975 to the 3rd of February 2017, then had 1704 personal and 1294 telepathic contacts [continue reading]

Characteristics

Source: http://www.figu.org/ch/ufologie/kontaktberichte/einfuehrung-kontakte


The Pleiadians / Plejaren and their Federation members are folks with physical bodies that for the most part look very similar to the Earth folks. There are some anatomical differences, but such differences usually belong to the Federation members. [continue reading]

Contact Report Categories

Art by Jim Nichols
Sunday 15th July 2007



The Sfath Contact Reports
1942 to 1953.[2]
Sfath was Billy's first teacher from the age of 5 (1942) for a duration of 11 years.



The Asket Contact Reports
1953 to 1964 and then on 03/02/2004.[3]
Asket continued from Sfath instructing Eduard from age 16 (1953) until he was 27.



The Pleiadian/Plejaren Contact Reports
1975 to present,[4] with many Plejaren Federation personnel
Communication with all other Plejaren personnel began when Eduard was aged 38 (1975) and has continued to today.


Contact Statistics

Contact Statistics contains details of Plejaren members and other Federation personnel and book statistics.

Translations

Website FAQ [Show/Hide]

Translation FAQ [Show/Hide]


Appeal to all responsible
Source: http://www.figu.org/ch/verein/in-eigener-sache/uebersetzungen


The UFO concerns of 'Billy' Eduard Albert Meier (BEAM) are but a small part of the tip of a vast iceberg hiding the doctrine of the truth of creation and its laws and commandments. BEAM's mission is to teach this doctrine of Earth humanity. All the knowledge and the whole truth are extremely extensive and of profound importance to every human being. Consequently everything has to be comprehensively recorded and made accessible to all people.

However, this requires a lot of work and also much needed capital investment, money, resource donation and voluntary labour. Therefore, the FIGU seeks those interested in the creative-natural truth, people who are willing to, free of charge, translate the writings and books of the 'Freie Interessengemeinschaft für Grenz- und Geisteswissenschaften and Ufologie-Studien' FIGU, into a variety of languages. To find a number of publishers which donors can purvey translated works, being printed and therefore distributed.

The efforts in this regard must however go out exclusively by the respective interested persons, as the FIGU labourers are not financially capable and able to place themselves in such a situation and besides that it is also not their job.

With regard to the production of fonts and books as well as their printing and distribution, SSSC is solely responsible for the German-speaking area, while for other languages ​​and countries their own interests (language translation) must be found.

To translate the scriptures and books, it is necessary that both the German and the translation language are perfectly mastered and that the contents of the script and the book are thoroughly studied and understood, which requires a thorough study, at least in relation to the all-embracing doctrine of creative natural truth. [continue reading]

External Links

References

[Show/Hide]