Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 114"
(Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 17:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 17:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Markvd said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | ...................I guess we know what gender dominates there planets in terms of numbers.:) I would like to know the planet with the lowest amount of inhabitants that needs to be filled immediately. j/k This is a tough one because how about if there is only one man on the planet inhabited by all kinds of women.:) Is it this lucky individuals duty to sve that planet. Then again there is Utah and nations to the East that have many wives. I think that is a complex situation if all those ladies all had a bad day. This is from the male full powered testosterone perspective so ladies don't feel offense. I think one is tough to handle but if you live a thousand year life span that could be a different mentality. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Markvd|Markvd]] 20:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 20:11, 1 December 2010
Comments on Contact Report 114 <comments />
Alive said ...
Markvd said ...
...................I guess we know what gender dominates there planets in terms of numbers.:) I would like to know the planet with the lowest amount of inhabitants that needs to be filled immediately. j/k This is a tough one because how about if there is only one man on the planet inhabited by all kinds of women.:) Is it this lucky individuals duty to sve that planet. Then again there is Utah and nations to the East that have many wives. I think that is a complex situation if all those ladies all had a bad day. This is from the male full powered testosterone perspective so ladies don't feel offense. I think one is tough to handle but if you live a thousand year life span that could be a different mentality.
--Markvd 20:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Quetzal said: "...a female life form, in every respect, can only mate with and become fertilized by one male life form alone, whereas the male life form is able to mate with and fertilize many female life forms, which is truly of necessity for the preservation of the species and for the maintenance or building up of the psyche in a natural law-related manner."
This statement could be used as a justification for sperm bank, not as a justification for polygamy, because polygamy is not intended to facilitate the preservation of species, but to expand sexual gratification of a man, which is not bad, if it is without coercion and deceit.
Marriage is not only about fertilization, but about many things which I am not the right person to mention. Fertilization could not be used as the only starting point to contemplate marriage, whether it is monogamy or polygamy.
---- M -- 17:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)