Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 226"

From Hinaharap ng sangkatauhan
(Comment provided by Sanjin - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Mark - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 50: Line 50:
  
 
--Sanjin 04:41, 10 July 2010 (BST)
 
--Sanjin 04:41, 10 July 2010 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Mark said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
newinitiation
 +
I wonder why they develop so many destructive weapons unless the plants and animals come alive I don't know who in the world we are trying to defend ourselves against. The Earth scientists and war minded folks are rather funny. Why not divert our resources into production rather than destruction. :)
 +
 +
--Mark 06:13, 10 July 2010 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 05:13, 10 July 2010

Comments on Contact Report 226 <comments />


Mark said ...

The Swiss have tried to conquer time by claiming the invention of the clock. Germany is blame for us meeting our deadlines due to time management. Send all Swiss to the prison planet for false claims. j/k That's a nice fact to know.

--Mark 22:04, 8 July 2010 (BST)

Lepuniv said ...

Hello Steven,

I see that you release very important information about the past, which were prediction then.

Wouldn't it be nice if we could find a translation in English of the latest Contact Reports. A lot of people could notice the accuracy of the predictions.

But I guess it is a matter of time.

You are doing a great job.

Thanks

Lepuniv


--Lepuniv 03:15, 9 July 2010 (BST)

newinitiation said ...

what is in the thermosphere that makes it an ideal ingredient for a destructive weapon? It cannot just be the heat at 2000 degrees Celsius. Or can the hot gases in the thermosphere be diverted back onto the surface of the earth through artificial means where hot tornadoes can be created and its path controlled just as HARRP can cause hurricanes and earthquakes to a specific location on any part of the earth. Could some heat resistant device be floated up in the thermosphere range and enable certain part of it to be heated and thereby directing the heat energy back onto some specific location with installations to trap the heat and use that to generate electricity. Just as HAARP creates a lens effect in the ionosphere with multiple of gigawatt radio waves concentrated back onto a specific location on earth, would this same danger be possible and the reason for the plejarens to warn of dangers associated with such technological method being deployed as weapons of mass destruction


--newinitiation 03:25, 10 July 2010 (BST)

Sanjin said ...

Hi newinitiation.

Don't be giving someone some bad ideas. ;)

--Sanjin 04:41, 10 July 2010 (BST)

Mark said ...

newinitiation I wonder why they develop so many destructive weapons unless the plants and animals come alive I don't know who in the world we are trying to defend ourselves against. The Earth scientists and war minded folks are rather funny. Why not divert our resources into production rather than destruction. :)

--Mark 06:13, 10 July 2010 (BST)