Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion"
From Hinaharap ng sangkatauhan
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Sheila - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 15:36, 8 May 2011 (BST) | --[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 15:36, 8 May 2011 (BST) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Sheila said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | My biggest concern right now is that the Hadron Collider is said to be a big part of the ozone depletion. So why are they sending an airborne version of it on the Endeavour? Hopefully Endeavour will never make it off the ground (and still hasn't after many months of false starts). | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Sheila|Sheila]] 17:34, 9 May 2011 (BST) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:34, 9 May 2011
Comments on Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion <comments />
Markvd said ...
Jamesm said ...
Mark I think the ozone hole will have recovered by 2065 but more precise information is available in this document: File:WMO-Scientific-Assessment-of-Ozone-Depletion-2006-20-Questions.pdf
--Jamesm 15:36, 8 May 2011 (BST)
Sheila said ...
My biggest concern right now is that the Hadron Collider is said to be a big part of the ozone depletion. So why are they sending an airborne version of it on the Endeavour? Hopefully Endeavour will never make it off the ground (and still hasn't after many months of false starts).
--Sheila 17:34, 9 May 2011 (BST)
..............no one go to the South Pole or else. :) Never planned to ever go there but my mind will also not even think of that possbility. I wonder how many holes we have and if we are in critical stage that is irreversible. HMMMMMMMMMMMMM
--Markvd 14:28, 8 May 2011 (BST)