Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion"

From Hinaharap ng sangkatauhan
(Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension)
 
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
--[[User:Markvd|Markvd]] 14:28, 8 May 2011 (BST)
 
--[[User:Markvd|Markvd]] 14:28, 8 May 2011 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Jamesm said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
Mark I think the ozone hole will have recovered by 2065 but more precise information is available in this document: [[File:WMO-Scientific-Assessment-of-Ozone-Depletion-2006-20-Questions.pdf]]
 +
 +
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 15:36, 8 May 2011 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 14:36, 8 May 2011

Comments on Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion <comments />


Markvd said ...

..............no one go to the South Pole or else. :) Never planned to ever go there but my mind will also not even think of that possbility. I wonder how many holes we have and if we are in critical stage that is irreversible. HMMMMMMMMMMMMM

--Markvd 14:28, 8 May 2011 (BST)

Jamesm said ...

Mark I think the ozone hole will have recovered by 2065 but more precise information is available in this document: File:WMO-Scientific-Assessment-of-Ozone-Depletion-2006-20-Questions.pdf

--Jamesm 15:36, 8 May 2011 (BST)