Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 475"

From Hinaharap ng sangkatauhan
(Comment provided by newinitiation - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Closer19 - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
--newinitiation 05:34, 13 July 2010 (BST)
 
--newinitiation 05:34, 13 July 2010 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Closer19 said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
Part two of 475 contact report:
 +
I believe there should be more awareness of this issue, considering the seriousness conveyed in the message. I know there is a lot of information about the potential danger Apophis poses and possible deflection scenarios, but still, we should continue (or begin) to advocate this message and hope that scientists take heed of Meier's information at some point. Anyone else agree?
 +
 +
--[[User:Closer19|Closer19]] 08:30, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 08:30, 7 November 2011

Jamesm 00:45, 29 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks Reece!

newinitiation said ...

I have heard BEAM pronounce Samjase; Sam ya zee Doesn't this sound like Sam ya si; the demigoddess of bane. Maybe I am mistaking Ptaah's pronunciation Sam jasi for Sam Ja Zee. Maybe Zee does not equate with Si as it shouldn't.

--newinitiation 05:34, 13 July 2010 (BST)

Closer19 said ...

Part two of 475 contact report: I believe there should be more awareness of this issue, considering the seriousness conveyed in the message. I know there is a lot of information about the potential danger Apophis poses and possible deflection scenarios, but still, we should continue (or begin) to advocate this message and hope that scientists take heed of Meier's information at some point. Anyone else agree?

--Closer19 08:30, 7 November 2011 (UTC)