Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 107"
From Hinaharap ng sangkatauhan
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension) |
(Comment provided by Zameen - via ArticleComments extension) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 20:29, 30 September 2010 (BST) | --[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 20:29, 30 September 2010 (BST) | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | == Zameen said ... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div class='commentBlock'> | ||
| + | And ofcourse they're going to give every excuse in the book. But on the other hand, what else could they do? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Zameen|Zameen]] 15:21, 1 October 2010 (BST) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:21, 1 October 2010
Comments on Contact Report 107 <comments />
Jamesm said ...
Zameen said ...
And ofcourse they're going to give every excuse in the book. But on the other hand, what else could they do?
--Zameen 15:21, 1 October 2010 (BST)
There is an interesting article in the New Scientist magazine about the Petrozavodsk UFO at http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Vb5Mz6DmutYC&lpg=PA897&ots=i4tqlfYAgF&dq=Petrozavodsk%201977%20ufo&pg=PA896#v=onepage&q=Petrozavodsk%201977%20ufo&f=false
--Jamesm 20:29, 30 September 2010 (BST)